I know I said I'd be writing about our move to New Mexico and the new situation we find ourselves in, but something's been playing on my mind for a long time now and I feel I have to write it down.
I have been extremely fortunate in my life to have had several mentors. There was the teacher who recognized that I was simply not good at the academic thing but that I might have talents that were worth encouraging. I brought him some of my writings...I called it poetry. He read it. Carefully. He was impressed that I had actually written something without being told to as a school project. But once he was over that surprise he read it all again. That was when he said to me, "These seem more like song lyrics than poetry." I immediately started taking a new interest in the songs I was hearing and quite soon after this I harassed my parents into letting me have a guitar. My dad even organized lessons with a young man he knew at work - Norman - who was into Johnny Cash and Buddy Holly. I got the hang of some Cash tunes pretty fast - and around this time I discovered Bob Dylan, so the lineage made sense - but I never did tune in to Buddy Holly. Those chords were so difficult! To this day I cannot play a strong E flat. And some of the others seemed like torture. Buddy was a chord master! I think I understood even then that the brilliance of Dylan was to say so much with so little.
Anyway, that was all a digression. The mentors that came later were just as important. There was the man who was the global creative head of the ad agency I ended up working for in London. He showed me that there was a whole world waiting to be explored - that I didn't have to stay in England just because I was born there.
Then there were other mentors as I journeyed around the world. One in particular was so important to me that even the fact that he said the most upsetting and disappointing thing to me - the real subject of this piece - could not destroy our friendship that has lasted to this day. And why no names have been, or will be, mentioned here.
What did he say that was so powerful I'm writing about it nearly twenty years later? The story goes like this.
I was feeling under-appreciated. I had been working my ass off and achieving a better than average amount of success as defined by the advertising business at the time. I had been creating some award winning work, keeping my clients happy and helping to bring in new business for the agency. But I was also realizing that many people around me were earning significantly more than I was. Ah the disease of greed that is the advertising world!
I decided I had enough stored up points to play a risky game. I wrote a letter of resignation and sent it to my mentor. I said I had been offered a higher paying position with an agency that shared a client with us. That would be the one place, I reasoned, they would not want me to go to.
I say it was a risky game for the simple reason I had no such offer. And the fact that I lied to my mentor has troubled me to this day. So, mentor, I'm sorry.
I timed my letter well. He had left the office for his weekend home by the time it arrived on his assistant's desk on Friday afternoon. I knew she would open it and that she would call him. And she did.
I got a call back within an hour. He said he was pretending the letter of resignation did not exist, I was to report to his office on Monday morning and we were going to "sort things out."
I went home triumphant. It had worked.
Sure enough on Monday morning all sorts of added incentives were laid at my feet. My salary increased of course and not by some insignificant amount. I was given a new, fancy title. And I was, for the first time, given stock options.
The first thing I had to do when I left his office was go find out what a stock option was!
But all this reward and recognition came at a price. And that's what has stayed with me all this time. I learned what a stock option was very quickly. But I have never learned why my mentor said what he did as he offered me all the stuff I felt I'd earned with my hard work and perseverance.
As he outlined the new deal he looked me hard in the eye and said words to the effect of "this comes with a condition. You are one of us now. I know you are very well liked by the people who work for you but you must separate yourself from them and take a management point of view from now on."
At the time I just nodded, took the money and ran. What else would a young, single man in Manhattan do?
But those words have echoed in my brain so many times since. And as I read every day now of the stupidity of the men and women (usually men!) running our major financial institutions - thinking that an entire month can just disappear from the books, or that we'll believe any of another dozen reasons why a bank that needed billions in bail-out funds is suddenly profitable again - I keep coming back to them.
"You are one of us now".
I do not like this man any less for those words he said all those years ago. We all do what we think we need to do to survive, to stay employed and feed our families. But I also think he hit the nail on the head when it comes to what ails our country, indeed the financial world.
It's still them and us. But who is who?
The guys pulling down multi-million dollar bonuses as their companies fail think they deserve the money. Because they are "us". And we don't get it because we are still "them".
I never turned my back on the people who I was privileged to manage. I know it was their talents that made me look even better than I could have been on my own. I never did truly adopt the "management point of view" and that's probably why I no longer work for a global advertising agency.
But I have to wonder if this is not the truth behind the differences between the Bush and Obama administrations. I don't think, as a candidate, Barack Obama ever intended to adopt the "management point of view", so ineloquently summed up by Bush whenever he refused to give a detailed answer to a question, instead simply stating "This is hard work" or "I'm the decider".
President Obama...I hope you never stop seeing yourself, paradoxically, as "them" - because in Washington, as on Wall Street and Madison Avenue, "us" is not the inclusive word it may seem.